The Red-Green Alliance Threat

Most Americans have no idea of what the Red-Green alliance is. To summarize it, it is the unholy alliance between two radically anti-American groups, which have put aside their differences and joined forces to destroy their common enemy, the American Republic. It is a perverted version of the concept: “the enemy of my enemy is my friend.” It is the Communists (the reds) and the Islamists (the green). And resources they have.

The ecosystem sustaining the Red-Green Alliance is one characterized by three core but distinct groups: the Legitimizers: intellectuals and institutions, the Enablers: influencers and pundits, and the Backers: financial networks.

Each of these three groups plays a distinct role in the growing power of neo-Marxist and Islamist revolutionaries inside the United States. This three-headed hydra is not entirely dissimilar to how mainstream political efforts operate, as there is always a need for policymakers, financial supporters, and political influencers to ensure the

viability of a cause or candidate.

However, the fundamental difference and inherent danger is in the Red-Green hydra’s goals: to lower the institutional defenses of an American electorate, to equip the radicals with sufficient resources to succeed and last but not least, to build internal support for violent revolution in order to, if necessary, overthrow the republic.

On the other hand, mainstream “right of center” political movements on the American political spectrum, a completely different model from the European model, are designed and intended as an antidote to the tendencies of leftists in government, Federal and State, to crush individual liberties on behalf of the collective good and are thereby, focused on preserving the American Republic. 

The Red-Green Alliance is no such thing. It is designed and intended to be a poison that kills the American Republic. Each of the hydra’s heads works with the other two, feeding off the successes of the others. Legitimizers are a mostly familiar group. The Frankfurt School of Marxist  theorists and their academic heirs, who built the intellectual architecture for the dissemination of Marxist philosophy into arenas outside of the original communist economic paradigm of bourgeoisie and proletariat.

Their Critical Theory slithered its way through our institutions of higher learning during the twentieth century and expanded into present-day “intersectionality,” wherein all groups, are categorized according to “oppressor versus the oppressed” dynamics. This is how Palestinians and third-world Muslim nations, were cast as victims of colonialism by the deceivers in leftist dominated academia.

Edward Said’s book “Orientalism,” published in 1978, just before the Islamic Revolution in Iran, provided the academic veneer for those who wanted to cast Western views of the Muslim world in the light of colonial domination. His infusion of Michel Foucault’s theory on discourse and

systems of power, helped catalyze the movement to immunize political Islam from left-wing criticism.

Orientalism remains a cornerstone work for Middle East studies and international relations departments in American universities. As an academic downstream of Europe’s postcolonial guilt of the 1960s, Edward Said was instrumental in spreading these views throughout the

United States through the institutions of higher education. 

It is important to highlight that the advancement and promulgation of critical theory within our institutions, is inextricably linked to postcolonial theory, of which leftists are avid adherents. This theory inserts the “oppressed-versus-oppressor” dynamic into the foreign-policy actions and priorities of Western nations, presenting every interaction between the West and its supposedly oppressed counterparts.

In the minds of the Red-Green Legitimizers, jihadist violence against Israel and the United States cannot ultimately be morally questionable or evil, because America and Israel are “oppressors” and jihadist movements are the “oppressed.” Therefore, the brutal mass murder, mass rape, and mass kidnapping of well over a thousand Israelis and dozens of American citizens is not only justifiable, but acceptable for the Red-Green Legitimizers.

U.C. Berkeley’s Hatem Bazian, has focused on Islamophobia within this

intersectional academic infrastructure. Alongside anti-imperialism, anti-Zionism, and resistance, the Red-Green Alliance master frame of Islamophobia, works to cast opposition to political Islam as the stance of bigots and oppressors. In this realm, Bazian masterfully employs the leftist strategy of publicly espousing radical rhetoric and ideas and then crying “Islamophobia” in response to anyone who dares criticize him and his comrades.

Key Legitimizers include high-profile academics such as Judith Butler, Hatem Bazian, and Joseph

Massad, all of which, leverage their positions within universities to provide ideological and intellectual ammunition for the Red-Green movement and its mindless adherents.

Institutions of higher learning, such as Columbia University, New York University, UC Berkeley, Harvard University, and the University of North Carolina, all operate as taxpayer-backed sanctuaries for the perpetuation of Marxist and Islamist ideologies. 

Nonprofit Organizations like the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), among many others, provide legal protection for Red-Green organizers and move the alliance into mainstream legitimacy within left-wing coalitions.

Indeed, the vast constellation of networks dedicated to the Red-Green revolution within the United States has been enabled by academic outposts largely funded by American taxpayers. But the Red-Green revolution has not remained in the faculty lounges. The legitimizing institutions in academia have spawned dozens of social organizations and nonprofits from their redoubts on American universities. 

Wider support for these entities is amplified by the second head of the

Red-Green hydra. The Enablers, who popularize the Red-Green Alliance as a desirable and morally justifiable political prism, through which to view the world, thereby making political power easier to attain. This axis comprises influencers, celebrities, podcasters, and political operatives with prominent media platforms. 

The purpose of the Enablers is to reinforce the overlapping master frames of anti-Imperialism, anti-Zionism, resistance, and Islamophobia within a wider audience; provide popular defense against Americans seeking to stop the Red-Green Alliance; and condition future militants toward revolutionary action, including extreme violence.

Popular left-wing influencers, such as the Twitch streamer Hasan Piker, have capitalized into the underlying purpose of the Red-Green Alliance with explicit support for jihadist terrorism and jihadist terrorist groups while embracing communism. Piker, the nephew of the far-left pundit and Muslim apologist, Cenk Uygur, was born in New Jersey to Turkish parents, and has become one of the most influential online voices for the Red-Green Alliance. He has nearly two million subscribers on his YouTube channel and over three million subscribers on his Twitch channel. 

One of his most recent and successful uploads to his YouTube channel is a half-hour-long mini documentary portraying the brutal Cuban communist regime, as a victim of American imperialist aggression.

His backers provide the financial resources and infrastructure needed to propagate the Red-Green revolution. The means by which this occurs are multifaceted. With institutional backing from American universities, activist organizations, and nonprofits flowing freely from these collegiate sanctuaries and high-profile influencers conditioning audiences to support revolution. Meanwhile, other wealthy donors simultaneously provide astroturf support for the Red-Green Alliance and leftist political trendlines. 

It is a chicken and egg question whether the financial backers made the Red-Green alliance politically relevant, or whether political relevance made its expansive funding ecosystem. What is indisputable is that the financial support fueling these organizations, political candidates, and neo-Marxist causes, comes from a combination of political action committees (PACs), dark

money organizations, well-heeled foundations, and taxpayer grants.  Yes, you hear right. Taxpayer money.

The funding streams are as varied as they are potent. One of the most prominent PACs elevating Red-Green political candidates is Justice Democrats, founded by former Bernie Sanders staffers. This PAC is the primary institutional engine that recruited and funded the Squad. It relies heavily on massive volumes of small-dollar, grassroots donations aggregated through ActBlue. 

Its financial strategy is to pool progressive money to primary perceived moderate Democrats and replace them with Socialist candidates who support neo-Marxist economic policies and Palestinian “solidarity” causes. Nine current members of the U.S. House of Representatives were endorsed and supported by Justice Democrats. More will be sworn in soon as a result of the midterms.

In conclusion, I will leave you with this sobering quote from Taylor Caldwell's 1965 historical novel, A Pillar of Iron:  

“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not as a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.”