The Politics of Division, Part 2

America is a right of center country. You can make the argument that it’s been trending “left” for over one hundred years ever since the liberal-progressive technocrats of the Wilson administration came to power, and you would be right, but that’s a topic for another day.

Americans of the conservative perspective, often say that the Left, aka Democrats, liberal progressives, live in an alternate reality, and this is stunningly accurate. American society was targeted by “Ideological Subversion” – the process of changing ones’ perception of reality –which led to the division and hostility present in American society today.

This was not a journey of chance or coincidence, nor the unavoidable evolutionary result of a society comprised of myriad ethnicities and cultures from every corner of the world. It is a product of deliberate, well planned, and implemented measures taken by the most persistent and existential threat to the United States of America following WW-1, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR).

Following the Bolshevik – the Reds – takeover of the original Russian revolution of 1917 from the Whites – the right leaning and conservative officers of the Russian Empire – Soviet leaders began to look to export their ideology worldwide and it wasn’t long before Soviet agents began infiltrating American society to conduct a campaign of ideological subversion to erode the strength of their primary impediment to Communist expansion, the United States.

The Soviet strategy was to turn American society upside down and undermine its source of strength: unity, national pride, and patriotism, the moral fabric of American society, through psychological warfare targeting minorities, unions, and the college educated white children, particularly women, of the elites.

As stated by Yuri Andropov, the former head of the Soviet KGB, and the third General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, the goal was to corrupt the morality of American society through drug and alcohol abuse, sex, pornography, rebellious music, all of which were strictly prohibited in Communist society. Exaggerate the economic and social class disparities of people, destroy religious institutions, exploit the educational system to create young revolutionaries, elect to office American crypto-communists, encourage government overspending to overwhelm the treasury, incite union strikes and protests, and promote unchecked immigration to diminish the white majority. Wait! Aren’t we seeing that today?

Let me introduce you to Stalin’s main man on the American front, Joseph Pogány, also known by his birth name, József Schwartz, no relation to György Schwartz, aka George Soros, other than Jewish ancestry. Pogány was a hard-core Hungarian born Communist revolutionary.

Upon Pogány’s arrival in New York in mid-July 1922, using the alias Joseph Lang, the American Communist movement that Pogány encountered, was in considerable disarray, racked by a bitter factional struggle, a proliferation of rival organizations, and economic woes. Since its inception in 1919, the CPUSA had to contend with state and federal authorities that sought to suppress the movement.

Schwartz, aka Pogány, aka Lang, and aka Pepper, the last being his writing pseudonym, had been a community organizer – agitator– in Hungary and Germany, where he learned certain innovative methods for artificially enhancing the influence of the Communist movement, therefore, Pogány was confident that, with proper planning, the CPUSA could become a major player in American politics. He was also convinced that the black community was ripe for psychological exploitation.

Pogány, having been tasked by Stalin with laying the foundation for all ideological subversion and agitation of the black community, published the book “The American Negro Problems,” in 1928, using his alias, John Pepper, in which he argued the tremendous Communist revolutionary potential that existed within the black community. Pogány believed that the racial differences and social-economic disparities in America, were a fertile ground for the exploitation of the black community’s grievances against America, real or imagined.

Pogány believed blacks, and other minorities, could be recruited and trained to rise up against Capitalism, further dividing American society. Pogány’s strategy of division is still bearing fruit today at the hands of minority race baiters, the white, college educated, liberal-progressives, and the masses of the deceived, the people called “useful idiots” by the Soviets.

We just witnessed the riots in LA and other parts of the country, including the Pacific Northwest, where there is a high concentration of violent groups like ANTIFA, an Anarchist-Socialist collective of misfits and miscreants, they serve the role of street soldiers. For useful idiots, aka cannon-fodder, look no further than the ridiculous “No Kings Day” march, allegedly attended by 11 million fools.

The old strategy of continuing to chip away at our social structure, to open old wounds and to deliberately inflict new ones, is in full effect. The goal of the Communist agitators of yesteryear was, and their modern day version today – the taxpayer funded activist NGO’s is, to make Americans believe that all the chaos in our streets is the result of the righteous struggle for civil rights, defense of the Constitution and a resistance to a tyrant who “would be king.”

The tactics are the same using the old labels used by the Communist agitators of yesteryear against anyone who stood in their way: “Nazis, Fascists, Antisemites.” And they have a new one: “MAGA Extremists.” They know that constantly associating the opposition with labels that already have negative or dark connotations, affects the mind in a way that these labels become true to the weak minded.

Honestly, how do you reason with someone whose moral values are corrupted yet they wholeheartedly believe they are righteous? How do you reason with people who dismiss the biological truth of two genders as man made, social constructs? How do you argue the truth with people who can’t intellectually defend facts other than by repeating slogans and fabricated responses, while calling you a Fascist, a Nazi, a transphobe, a xenophobe, a homophobe, an antisemite or a MAGA insurrectionist?

How do you approach someone who has a deep, visceral hatred of you, for reasons they can’t even explain? These are rhetorical questions. These are rhetorical questions. You can’t.